Which prompted a whole lot of support and some disagreement from Singaporeans (my impression was that most comments were supportive, but I could be projecting), and this sarcastic comment:
As usual PAP misses the point and the opportunity.
What PAP (and Minister Shanmugam) should point out is how egalitarian SG society and politics are.
In the US for example, you have to be a candidate for President (and eventually POTUS), before you can invite a foreign leader to intervene in your politics and your election.
In Singapore, you don't even need to be a billionaire or a presidential candidate, let alone be President. Or even an MP.
Now THAT'S what I call Free.
Or as Singaporeans would say, "too free, ah?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please see "About" before commenting.
Do keep a copy of your comment if you value it. You will note that there is not a lot of comments on this blog. Comments may be deleted without notice. Comments may be moderated at times.
If you agree to the above, please proceed to provide your intelligent and/or thoughtful comment.